Revision of business & economy bills 2008 from March 31, 2008 - 8:30am
The revisions let you track differences between multiple versions of a post.
Bills in Brief
Congress kicked off its year working on an economic stimulus plan, but it could get to other business-related bills left hanging from '07 later in the year.
Housing: With everyone blaming the subprime market for turning the economy sour, Congress started last year looking for ways to keep foreclosures to a minimum while taming the subprime market from future excess. It didn't get far, but this year the pressure may be on to wrap up a series of bills introduced last year - from expanding federal loans to making it harder for brokers to sign off on risky loans. See our "Housing Jitters" page for more.
Farm bill: Up for reauthorization and witha version passed already in the House, the farm bill has agricultural special interests, poverty advocates, fiscal hawks, among others, wrestling over how to rework this sprawling bill. So far, the agricultural interests and poverty advocates are winning.
Banks will be banks: Congress is trying to figure out whether to let commercial businesses own "Industrial Loan Companies" (kinda like banks) - which some warn would create a risky conflict of interest. (HR 698)
Consumer protection: After a little too much lead paint from China, both the House and Senate passed bills that would give the Consumer Protection Bureau more money and authority to test and recall toys. The two versions of the passed bill, HR 4040, now need to be worked out before final passage (WP).
Patent reform: Already passed in the House, HR 1908, Congress may revamp the ways patents are granted and challenged. A House passed bill, HR 1908, would make it harder for companies to protect/reap windfalls from their patents, primarily by letting judges set royalties not for the full value of the product that uses a patent - but just for the proportion of the product that the patent is used. (See this NYTs overview of what's at stake for each side.)
Credit cards: Dems were talking last year about clamp down on credit card policies that some say take advantage of credit-happy Americans. Nothing happened, but bills could resurface this year.
Sarbanes-Oxley: Put in place to prevent more Enron house-of-cards collapses, Sarbanes-Oxley rules are seen by some as an excessive burden on small businesses. Congress has been thinking about cutting small businesses some slack - almost ever since Sarbanes-Oxley went through; there's a chance they could take some action this year.
Trade: Free-traders will be pushing for three deals - Panama, Columbia and South Korea - to go through. Columbia is at top of the list, but before taking any free-trade action, Congress says it wants first to help out downsized workers by re-upping the Trade Adjustment Assistance bill. Congress may also vote to extend special trade status for Columbia, Peru,
Ecuador and Bolivia, letting most of their goods enter the states duty
free - as well as okay ongoing tariff breaks for developing nations.
With a Congress increasingly irked by China's monetary policy and lax intellectual property enforcement, it could also take retaliatory tariff action against China.
CEOs: Congress was tossing around the idea last year of giving shareholders the right to have an "advisory" vote on CEO pay packages (LAT). It didn't go anywhere, but could resurface in '08.
Telecoms: Attempts to pass a telecommunications bill with internet neutrality safeguards also fell by the wayside last year, but - who knows - could return.
Eminent Domain: A House bill, HR 926, would cut off development assistance to states that use eminent domain to turn over property to private developers.
Taxing investment funds: Congress may vote to raise the tax on the income managers make on hedge funds, private equity and venture capital. (WP)
Updated March 31, 2008
Did we miss something, let some slant slip in, lose a link - or do you just have something to say? Drop a line below! In the spirit of open dialogue, cJ asks you keep it civil, keep it real and keep it focused on the message, not the messenger. See our policy page for more on what that all means.

Post new comment